VIDEO ANALYSIS: THE VICTORY TO MR. DONALD TRUMP, SHOCK ON SOME OF USA RESIDENT MARGINAL AND MIGRATE BY by Irivuzimana Aime Muyombano Ph.D
VIDEO ANALYSIS: THE VICTORY TO MR. DONALD TRUMP, SHOCK ON SOME OF USA RESIDENT MARGINAL AND MIGRATE BY MUYOMBANO, 2016
Critical
Analysis on the Victory of Mr. Trump, elected as USA President
It is one of the most astonishing victories in
American political history. It will leave individuals in the US and beyond
particular minority in shock, wondering what is to come, and asking: how did Mr.
Donald Trump,
President of USA to be do it.
After informing his victory, Mr. Donald Trump shows in his pledge to
be a president "for all Americans" after being elected the 45th
President of the United States, capturing crucial victories over Hillary
Clinton in a remarkable show of strength which could be consider as a positive step
for the future of USA' citizens and those residents who could have fear of the
new manager.
Some of
the keys component was used for the Republican political party and her
candidate Mr. Trump, we reflect that they took a series of enter battleground for
the more popular states such as Florida, Ohio and North Carolina and others, before
stunningly carrying Pennsylvania, a state that had not backed a Republican for
president since 1988 because normally these states use to be referee as local
place with a big number of population and this had enable Madam Clinton who had
a higher share of the popular vote than her counterpart Mr. Donald Trump.
Trump was the first reality TV star and the first
non-politician since Dwight Eisenhower to win the nomination for president of a
major political party but difficult to forget that he is the known business man
and all is moving around Businesses either Geo-Political, economic, military
and socio-development. He was the first to spend part of his campaign denying sexual assault allegations and
clashing with the family of a fallen soldier and a Miss Universe. At 70, he is
the oldest person in history to be elected US president.
May be we could
also say that President to be Mr. Donald Trump was demonstrated the real face
or image of the American majority vis a vis to their political parties responsibilities
on their socio-economic development and International Political philosophy but
in other hand we could add that it’s going to cost Mr. Trump to make sure
American society, particularly those who did not vote for him to trust him as
their president
If we look on
his speech, Mr. DonaldTrump copied and recast Ronald Reagan’s promise to make America
great again. In four words it captured both pessimism and optimism, both
fear and hope. The slogan harks back to a supposed golden age of greatness in
the 1950s during the cold war period, perhaps or the 1980s and implies that it
has been lost but then promises to restore it. It went straight to the gut,
unlike rival Hillary Clinton’s website
manifesto and more nuanced proposals.It was an appeal to the heart, not the
head, in a country where patriotism should never be underestimated.
Within this
analysis, allow us to add that whatever Mr. President to be (Trump) used to
indicate during his campaign, was only political campaign which is allowed in
political sciences for getting the majority American particularly old
generation like what happened in Brexit who have been established their
activities system long time ago and found it started to be enjoyed by the
foreigners.
Take look on
this statement given by Chris Matthews, a host on MSNBC, said
in September: “A lot of this support for Trump, with all his flaws which he
displays regularly, is about the country patriotic feelings people have, they
feel like the country has been let down. Our elite leaders on issues like
immigration, they don’t regulate any immigration it seems. They don’t regulate
trade to our advantage, to the working man or working woman’s advantage. They
take us into stupid wars. Their kids don’t fight but our kids do.
Serious
speaking I am not sure if as Mr. President to be used to say that he will
ordering the migrate to leave the great Federal State power because of these
two reasons
1.
Even if is becoming the Boss of
United States of America, does mean that he should take decision without any
approval of the Legislative power which is the USA Congress, as the Executive
power manager should suggest if approved then he can have the said
responsibility
2.
Remember USA is composed by the
States which are also independent with their only leaders, system with the
policy and strategies that assist them to grow their socioeconomic development
that increase the welfare of the States ‘community; some of these state are
managed in terms of economic and financial activities by these Migrate leaving
with them
Development
In 2003 Trump
became the host of the reality TV show The
Apprentice, in which hopefuls competed for a chance to work for his
organisation. For a decade millions of viewers were fed the idea of Trump as a
successful businessman, a boss with the power to say: “You’re fired!” Trump
biographer Gwenda Blair said: “It gave him 10 years of being in
front of the American public being the boss, being CEO, hiring people, famously
firing people, being the guy who can fix it, the one who knows everything,
being the big authoritarian patriarchal guy. “I think that has imprinted on a
lot of people, that they ‘trust’ him that makes him ‘trustworthy’. That
combined with the reality TV phenomenon in which it became acceptable to have
something that wasn’t really true. It legitimised a kind of a not-quite-true
thing and shifted our idea of what’s an acceptable version of reality.” In the
media age, Trump had accumulated not only financial capital but celebrity
capital. On 8 November he cashed in.
The Republican recovery
Trump seemingly declared war on his own party.
During and after a traumatic primary campaign, he attacked the Bush family,
House speaker Paul Ryan, former nominees Mitt Romney and John McCain and many
more. It was anything but a united front and it would normally have cost him in
terms of a lack of organisational “ground game” or financial muscle.
But many Trump voters relished his attacks on the
party establishment. They complained the the members of Congress they elected
made promises they fail to keep. They noticed the years of deadlock and
government shutdown and thirsted for change. So when Romney and company condemned
him, it actually worked to his advantage as a rallying
point for his supporters. He ripped up the rule book as the maverick outsider
set to march on corrupt, do-nothing Washington.
And yet, at the same, the Republican national
committee never lost faith in him. Chair Reince Priebus was
quick to declare Trump the nominee and twist and turn and excuse his every
misdemeanour. Chief strategist and communications director Sean Spicer
aggressively pushed the Trump cause. Somehow, even as pieces of debris flew off
in every direction, the party machinery kept working to deliver the unlikeliest
of victories, and vindication for Priebus.
Yes, the demographics were against him. When Obama
was first elected in 2008, 74% of the total voter turnout was white. By 2012,
this had fallen to 71%, and in 2016, it was expected to dip to 69%. After
Romney’s defeat four years ago, a Republican autopsy report urged
the party to reach out to women and minorities to survive; Trump did the exact
opposite.
But other pressures were at work. The Democrats had
held the White House for eight years. Clinton would have been the first
candidate since George HW Bush in 1988 to
extend one party’s hold for a third term. Even Obama’s high approval rating
evidently did not dim the appetite for his direct opposite.
David Axelrod, mastermind of Obama’s election wins,
wrote in the New York Times
last January: “Open-seat presidential
elections are shaped by perceptions of the style and personality of the
outgoing incumbent. Voters rarely seek the replica of what they have. They
almost always seek the remedy, the candidate who has the personal qualities the
public finds lacking in the departing executive.”
He added: “Many Republicans view dimly the very
qualities that played so well for Mr Obama in 2008. Deliberation is seen as
hesitancy; patience as weakness. His call for tolerance and passionate embrace
of America’s growing diversity inflame many in the Republican base, who view
with suspicion and anger the rapidly changing demographics of America. The
president’s emphasis on diplomacy is viewed as appeasement.
“So who among the Republicans is more the
antithesis of Mr Obama than the trash-talking, authoritarian, give-no-quarter
Mr Trump?”
A majority (56%) of white Americans including three
in four (74%) of white evangelical Protestants said American society has
changed for the worse since the 1950s in a recent survey by the Public Religion Research
Institute.
Trump was the ultimate protest vote with obvious
echoes of Brexit. Film-maker Michael Moore told NBC’s Meet the Press in
October: “Across the Midwest, across the Rustbelt, I understand why a lot of
people are angry. And they see Donald Trump as their human Molotov cocktail
that they get to go into the voting booth on November 8 and throw him into our
political system. I think they love the idea of blowing up the system.”
Author Prof. Dr. Rugema D. Muyombano
0Awesome Comments!